This Article explains that scientists found evidence that makes Bigfoot real like the statement that follows "Scientists and yeti enthusiasts believe there may finally be solid evidence that the apelike creature roams the vast Siberian tundra," reports from The Guardian (a web site that also publishes articles like Time Magazine.) The article add’s on with the experts from Canada and Sweden have set their minds on 95% belief of Bigfoot and Yeti’s exist’s. The scientist experts started believing that mythical animal’s like the Bigfoot and Yeti are alive and real, after a conference in a town called Tashtagol, in Kemerovo region thousands of miles near Moscow. And they still roam the earth with proof that a group of scientific researchers have found in a area near Moscow, in addition over the years people have seen sightings of a Yeti a close cousin of the Bigfoot, In Kemerovo the group of scientist experts had announced on October 10, 2012 an expedition on the previous weekend collected evidence of the existents of Yeti. Could this also prove that Bigfoot exists to? The evident’s include several hairs, footprints, a bed of the ‘mythical animal’ or Yeti, and various other markers which is configurationally not explained in the article.
Written by Joe Jackson, Published October 11,2011 on TIME MAGAZINE
To Read more follow the link below: http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/10/11/scientists-95-sure-bigfoot-lives-in-russian-tundra/#ixzz2BnU3MsUh
By Lauren Daniels, Published January 25,2012. LINK is posted for article: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/01/25/should-we-declare-open-season-on-bigfoot/
This article come’s out straight forward and states " Every year, believers and enthusiasts provide heaps of secondary proof that Bigfoot exists: low-quality video, out-of-focus snapshots and the occasional fossilized "footprint." But it’s not the quantity but the quality of proof that’s lacking." and this short statement is enough to explain what the article is going to be about but, I didn’t see this coming when the news MSNBC reporters gave another example of the show "Finding bigfoot" that airs on Animal Planted the reporters say that the show does it’s part on increasing the amount of evidence that Bigfoot really walks on earth. The reporters have more to say about the show such as the show adds more fuel to the fire with shaky videos of Bigfoot, then reporters also say other hunters aren’t the only ones trying to make Bigfoot transform from a myth to reality. Over a dozen experts travel 2,000 miles east of Moscow a region of Russia for a conference on Yeti a cousin of Bigfoot that was 95% belief that Yeti is real also. But the reporters say that is not good enough proof that the Yeti and Bigfoot are real, they say the other 5% SHOULD be full proof proven in blood, or at lease a very good picture. Some people debate among the Bigfoot believers as to weather it’s okay to shoot and kill the creature. They also have a theory do people really want to find Bigfoot? Or would that just take the fun out of searching for a creature that may not exist. Maybe that’s why the show of "finding Bigfoot" is the most watch on animal planted, the reporters also say that the show is so popular that they may put some channels out on TV. I think that people should believe what they want either it is true/real or un-true and fake.
This article on “Be Wary of Bobo, Sasquatch” explains that
Bigfoot has been seen in Florida, Oregon, Washington State, and Alaska. Now
Bigfoot is being seen in New York, Animal Planet tells in the opening season 2
of “Hunting Bigfoot.” That Matt Moneymaker the president of the Bigfoot Field Research
Organization, in an episode on Sunday showed the three sidekicks of the BFRO
organization: Cliff Barackman, Ranae Holland and James Fay. as they investigate
a family video that Matt had shot on an evening just hanging out around a
campfire, when something climbing in a tree, captured accidently 15 years ago,
is proof of a baby Bigfoot in that area near new York called Catskills. As they
investigate there are skeptics being made that the baby Bigfoot is really just someone’s
pet monkey, or the video was shot during a music festival. They prove to the
skeptics that it was not either of that monkeys or music fest. Because the investigators
experiment by getting a grown male climb the tree n swing around and it clearly
don’t match the thing’s movement in the video. And they had made their mind up
by stating “we clearly looking at a baby Sasquatch in this footage,” and Mr.
Moneymaker believes it also.
This Article explains that scientists found evidence that makes Bigfoot real like the statement that follows "Scientists and yeti enthusiasts believe there may finally be solid evidence that the apelike creature roams the vast Siberian tundra," reports from The Guardian (a web site that also publishes articles like Time Magazine.) The article add’s on with the experts from Canada and Sweden have set their minds on 95% belief of Bigfoot and Yeti’s exist’s. The scientist experts started believing that mythical animal’s like the Bigfoot and Yeti are alive and real, after a conference in a town called Tashtagol, in Kemerovo region thousands of miles near Moscow. And they still roam the earth with proof that a group of scientific researchers have found in a area near Moscow, in addition over the years people have seen sightings of a Yeti a close cousin of the Bigfoot, In Kemerovo the group of scientist experts had announced on October 10, 2012 an expedition on the previous weekend collected evidence of the existents of Yeti. Could this also prove that Bigfoot exists to? The evident’s include several hairs, footprints, a bed of the ‘mythical animal’ or Yeti, and various other markers which is configurationally not explained in the article. 
